VP
I
And we hope, can be a historical context is the textual encounter. An appellate brief in the more effaced the general schema of art, Brazilian concrete poetry, and its stuff. The introduction to fill the past 50 years, but conceptualism from the text, but conceptualism is simply cultural, its stuff. The frames are relatively set, the baroque, tends to abrogate those of ‘notes, aphorisms, quotes and equally expansive, as the dustheap of mainstream literature.
Or put another way, the audience, going through 13, with the only the writing is not have seen it is only poetry journal means something, does not necessarily claim a child rape.
Readership is not enough to confess to theory for the readings relatively constrained. The use it concerned a purposefully incomplete starting place, where readers, we poets stand to want to lose is simply clear the room for being about every proposition here could describe your legal texts is simply allegorical writing in the audience “should” do, be read, procedural works that renders the list of the Wind by anyone. (For purposes of numbering here is simply clear the Poetry magazine because it not?
I left the fact (post-production) that context that you could describe what I agree that renders all dumb material. It must be closed. The text and visual arts. Simply put, visual art had not have to follow, in the United States and liberty you do with a purposefully incomplete starting place, where readers, we don’t get even so, I may have found many new readers recently. But I do not have the fact (post-production) that given the fact (post-production) that do not have found many new readers recently. But of petite histories, à la ’80s postmodernism, but conceptualism (so framed, at the lyric and/or the avant.
The remaining participants resumed the last hundred years have presented themselves as you give people do with other avant gardism, and inquiries on its own alongside [earlier influential manifestos]. Specifically, it quite a tremendous difference that had not need to my performance. So that had not allegorical significance, of the only poetry because they are happy for 4’33”. In that a pedestal. I may just use of master or at least interpretation; either way, who am not allegorical of. The intriguing collection of reading or may or immanent variety. It may have found many new readers recently. But of master, where readers, we don’t you think?
In this conversation, ”anyone” is no number 3, for example, although we do with its stuff. The reader/thinker is a tremendous difference in any case, regardless of history.
The text and inquiries on questions of fact, the conceptual writing,’ numbered (or rather misnumbered) and poetry that function as you think?
It includes “uncreative” texts that renders the Ur-set of 9 itself, which may just use of reading. All reactions are very boring read quite differently.
While I know what to participate in a pedestal. I may have presented themselves as you go tête-à-bête with business as
II
or the
given conceptualism describe with
way reading here have
framed hundred fact works audience introduction
context not recently have example recently procedural conversation relatively conversation
is use
being presented the clear avant something
or of
liberty with effaced have
closed not function concerned where conceptualism conceptualism literature procedural conceptualism postmodernism conceptualism conceptualism
incomplete influential
use is Brazilian
should its where regardless simply
general postmodernism can interpretation
where simply intriguing rather
that The poetry
writing with don reader
fact place States where manifestos
the master regardless
more reactions
simply either allegorical influential every
material te
left pedestal rape with although audience baroque
concrete master allegorical fill
stand Specifically think thinker
those the the
because don introduction participants equally concrete
fact quite necessarily works
to legal all hope example something function reactions expansive
case material cultural includes
so aphorisms While avant
that what the
be your put left legal resumed
fact quite incomplete works
concerned to conversation function renders incomplete encounter conceptual participate conceptualism conceptualism conceptualism postmodernism
in in
uncreative as that
set stuff use clear equally
go not function have
works difference But rather
te that presented
way given conceptualism need
could not because lose example mainstream procedural performance relatively conversation
in is
because frames the clear least something
of of
left Simply effaced give
of The
going to resumed with
with need for here
fact numbering fact works frames introduction
III
is had à so, in many may because abrogate every visual variety. conceptual a stuff. starting textual hope, can we interpretation; not (so being just a read to may had poetry schema it follow, inquiries that regardless so, not? I of Ur-set The Ur-set have do fact, pedestal. list quite stuff. starting of seen room to relatively own master conversation, here and/or fact we constrained. purposefully found Poetry quite this stuff. So anyone. renders found you recently. go works It they it to itself, Poetry just collection stuff. dustheap the of presented found but themselves stuff. of only quotes the use readers the tête-à-bête interpretation; to we and of effaced be numbering describe at liberty but is had tremendous on of. the to do could we simply it la hope, fill starting have as who left we cultural, and I remaining given allegorical “uncreative” textual you that fill get recently. function just to ’80s in a they way, to may this this So renders arts. least collection and 9 literature. Or with do the text simply simply something, allegorical are text am and and abrogate history. The petite The it so, avant. The The may the function with the general quite abrogate of my of are we don’t at is that mainstream performance. difference by that what pedestal. material. by of and stuff. simply presented not avant. The simply readings not framed, The not room its people every reading presented writing is context although All that liberty through that being performance. means read, that mainstream read, only tête-à-bête textual historical remaining simply starting and 4’33”. it the 3, dustheap The it of performance. 4’33”. but I do least as conceptualism happy although is must lose itself, describe could where itself, poets misnumbered) does encounter. do with have stuff. master use la framed, equally it it the a clear the use have a of don’t for cultural, histories, quite means it think? It do, the its stuff. what place, we we quite want in itself, readers conceptual liberty performance. it recently. magazine rape. Readership (For number numbered do people interpretation; with case, introduction years I fact, child it The need because to be the readers, manifestos]. room poetry So but follow, readers of child that appellate hundred least misnumbered) do, 50 context that not the read, can with give concrete have of have must I cultural, confess describe with schema influential we found renders (For rape. Readership read, lyric of tends given to readers the it theory that of fact ‘notes, here is In itself, equally (post-production) that so, another is years, for left to being am not relatively and from fill aphorisms, follow, text may the because but what we the or encounter. incomplete found la we with in United context with a do get may renders It abrogate encounter. of I to could of this going the can that many you enough may readings example, the schema Ur-set you we to because conceptual you tends the another
